Thursday, February 12, 2009

History of evolutionary thought

The history of evolutionary thought has roots in antiquity. However, until the 18th century, Western biological thinking was dominated by essentialism, the belief that every species has essential characteristics that are fixed and unalterable. During the Enlightenment, naturalists began to focus on the variability of species; the emergence of paleontology with the concept of extinction further undermined the static view of nature. In the early 19th century, Jean-Baptiste Lamarck proposed his theory of the transmutation of species, the first fully formed scientific theory of evolution. In 1858, Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace published a new evolutionary theory, which was explained in detail in Darwin's On the Origin of Species. The theory was based on the idea of natural selection. The synthesis of natural selection with Mendelian genetics during the 1920s and 1930s founded the new discipline of population genetics. The gene-centered view of evolution rose to prominence in the 1960s, followed by the neutral theory of molecular evolution, sparking debates over adaptationism, the units of selection, and the relative importance of genetic drift versus natural selection. In the late 20th century, DNA sequencing led to molecular phylogenetics and the reorganization of the tree of life into the three-domain system.

Read the rest of this article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_evolutionary_thought

1 comments:

steve said...

Happy B-day Charlie D.! I heard a fascinating story on my way to work this morning on NPR about how Darwin declined to publish his Theory of Evolution for about twenty year (he came to his conclusions at about the age of 28), for several speculated reasons. One was the possibility that he wanted to further solidify his theories with further research before presenting them to a strongly, predominantly Christian public. The second is he was about to marry a very Christian-leaning woman and didn't want to drive her away with his beliefs. After some years married, she learned of his theories and was OK with them, but not too crazy about the prospect (in her mind) of them being separated in the afterlife - she going to heaven, he to hell (ahhh, the power of religious scare-tactics is strong). Years later, their beloved ten year old daughter, who was once a healthy and vibrant person, died of a terrible, unidentified sickness. Strangely enough, this loss, extremely traumatic to the couple, had made their personal convictions and beliefs even stronger, yet at the same time, they as a couple grew closer, knowing they made it through, together, one of the most emotionally difficult periods they could ever have imagined. it was an interesting story.